PROJECT LEADERSHIP
Your project needs a leader, not another status report.
We step into complex IT programs as decision-makers — removing blockers, aligning stakeholders, and driving delivery. Not project management. Project leadership.
The difference between managing a project and leading one
Project management is a discipline. It tracks tasks, manages timelines, and reports status. It's necessary and valuable — but it's not enough when a project is stuck, political, or technically ambiguous.
Project leadership is a posture. It means making decisions when the data is incomplete. Aligning stakeholders who disagree. Saying no to scope that doesn't serve the outcome. Taking accountability for delivery, not just for the plan.
Tracks tasks.
Makes decisions.
Reports status.
Removes blockers.
Manages the timeline.
Owns the outcome.
Escalates problems.
Solves them.
Follows the plan.
Adapts when the plan is wrong.
How we engage
01
Interim CTO / Program Director
We take full ownership of a program or technology organization for a defined period — typically 3 to 12 months. We make hiring decisions, set technical direction, manage vendor relationships, and drive delivery. When the permanent leader is in place, we hand over a functioning operation, not a transition document.
02
Advisory
Weekly check-ins with your existing project lead. We review progress, challenge assumptions, and provide decision support on architecture, resourcing, and stakeholder management. Light-touch but high-impact — the outside perspective your internal team doesn't have.
03
Rescue
Your project is late, over budget, or stuck in a political deadlock. We parachute in, assess the situation in the first week, and present a recovery plan by week two. Then we execute it — with your team, not around them. Not every project can be saved, but most can be redirected.
Results from the field
Challenge
A pan-European logistics company had a stalled ERP migration — 8 months behind schedule, 3 different vendors pointing fingers, and the steering committee had lost confidence in the project team.
Approach
We came in as interim program director. In the first two weeks, we restructured the vendor governance model, replaced the project plan with a milestone-based delivery framework, and re-established direct communication between the technical team and the steering committee.
Result
ERP migration delivered in 14 weeks. Vendor costs reduced 30% through renegotiated SLAs. Steering committee confidence restored within the first month.
Challenge
A scale-up's CTO left mid-way through a platform rewrite. The engineering team had no technical leadership, and the investors were asking questions the founders couldn't answer.
Approach
We served as interim CTO for 6 months — leading the engineering team, presenting at board meetings, and completing the platform rewrite while simultaneously running the search for a permanent CTO.
Result
Platform rewrite shipped on schedule. Permanent CTO hired and onboarded with a 30-day transition plan. Zero attrition in the engineering team during the transition.
“When our CTO left, we were in trouble. G3 Prime didn't just fill the gap — they raised the bar. The engineering team performed better under their interim leadership than it had in the previous two years.
J. Bakker · CEO · Tech Scale-up (NL)
Related Services